SIECUS Publications

Back to Fact Sheets

Public Support for Comprehensive Sexuality Education

Adobe Acrobat Reader needed Adobe Acrobat format

When it comes to sexuality education, we often seem like a nation divided. Reading newspapers or listening to school board debates, one might think that adults cannot decide whether schools should provide comprehensive education about sexuality or take a strict abstinence-only-untilmarriage approach.

In fact, when asked, the vast majority of American adults, including parents and voters, supports comprehensive sexuality education, disapproves of the government's investment in abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, and rejects popular myths that suggest teaching about sexuality encourages teens to be sexually active. Nevertheless, the government currently spends nearly $138 million per year for abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, in direct contradiction to public opinion.

This fact sheet compiles the results of numerous national and statewide surveys, all of which show overwhelming support for a comprehensive approach to sexuality education. SIECUS hopes that this fact sheet will help advocates in their efforts to ensure that public policies keep pace with the desires of the American people.

(Taken from SIECUS Report, Fall 2004)


SCHOOL-BASED SEXUALITY EDUCATION

Parents and other adults overwhelmingly support making sexuality education part of junior high and high school curricula. In addition, many parents believe that sexuality education can help young people make responsible decisions about sexual behavior and sexual health.

A WIDE RANGE OF TOPICS

In recent years many schools have restricted the topics that are covered in sexuality education either because of an ongoing community controversy or the fear that one might erupt. The truth is, however, that the majority of parents wants sexuality education to cover a wide range of topics. In fact, most parents believe that it is appropriate to teach students about many subjects that are considered controversial, including abortion, masturbation, and sexual orientation. Not surprisingly, given the reality they face, young people also want sexuality education to cover many topics.

THE POLITICS OF SEXUALITY EDUCATION

Sexuality education is becoming ever more political, with the federal government supporting strict abstinence-onlyuntil- marriage programs, states debating how to address sexuality in their schools, and communities bracing for controversy. Most people, however, do not support current policies that favor abstinence-only-until-marriage programs and funding. In addition, parents reject many of the myths about sexuality education that have been used to remove programs and restrict topics.

STATE SURVEYS

Support for sexuality education exists across the country. Mirroring national surveys, numerous state surveys show that adults from California to New York and Connecticut to Minnesota support providing young people with comprehensive school-based sexuality education, disapprove of funding for abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, and reject myths about sexuality education.

CALIFORNIA

CONNECTICUT

MINNESOTA

SOUTH CAROLINA

References

  1. Sex Education in America (Washington, DC: National Public Radio, Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, and Kennedy School of Government, 2004), p. 5.
  2. Sex Education in America, p. 28.
  3. Sex Education in America, p. 6.
  4. Sex Education in America, p. 28
  5. Sex Education in America, p. 9
  6. Ibid.
  7. Ibid.
  8. Ibid.
  9. Sex Education in America, p. 11.
  10. Ibid.
  11. Ibid.
  12. Ibid.
  13. Sex Education in America, p. 12.
  14. T. Hoff, et al., National Survey of Adolescents and Young Adults: Sexual Health Knowledge, Attitudes, and Experiences (Menlo Park, CA: Henry Kaiser Family Foundation, 2003), pp. 79-71, 111-112.
  15. Sex Education in America, p. 7.
  16. Mobilizing Support for Sex Education: New Messages and Techniques (New York:The Othmer Institute of Planned Parenthood of NYC, 2002.)
  17. Ibid.
  18. Ibid.
  19. Ibid.
  20. Sex Education in America, p. 22.
  21. Get Real About Teen Pregnancy! Findings in Brief: A Look at California's Views on Teen Pregnancy (San Francisco: The Field Institute, 1999).
  22. Ibid.
  23. Sex Education in California Public Schools: Are Students Learning What They Need to Know? (San Francisco: ACLU of Northern California, 2003).
  24. Connecticut Sexuality Education Survey: Survey Among Connecticut Residents (Washington, DC:Advocates for Youth, 2004), p. 1.
  25. Ibid.
  26. Ibid.
  27. Connecticut Sexuality Education Survey, p. 2.
  28. Ibid.
  29. Connecticut Sexuality Education Survey, p. 3.
  30. What Parents Want: Sex-Ed Survey (St. Paul: Minnesota Organization on Adolescent Pregnancy, Parenting, and Prevention, 2001).
  31. Ibid.
  32. Ibid.
  33. Ibid.
  34. Ibid.
  35. F. Alton, South Carolina Speaks 2004 (Columbia, SC: South Carolina Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, 2004).
  36. Ibid.
  37. Ibid.
  38. Ibid.

page divider

Home | Publications | Support SIECUS | Links | About SIECUS | Site Navigation | Search | Donate
Policy & Advocacy | Media | International | Library | Youth Development | School Health Education Clearinghouse

copyright © 1996-2004, SIECUS
Web Master: siecus@siecus.org

Back to SIECUS home page